PRACTICE AREASIntellectual Property Litigation
- University of Wisconsin, Madison (J.D., cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2006)
- University of British Columbia (B.A. (Hons.), 2000), Economics
- Judicial Clerk to the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2006-2007
LICENSES & ADMISSIONS
- Licensed in Texas
- United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas
- United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
- State Bar of Texas
- Austin Bar Association
- American Bar Association, Antitrust Section
"Dentists Extract $80M From Supply Cos. In Antitrust Deal," Law36006/25/2019 | Law360
The final approval on the deal comes years after dentists first launched a series of litigation accusing three dominant distributors of artificially inflating prices.
"Samsung Infringed Licensing Co.’s Patent, Owes $5.9M," Law36011/07/2018
An Eastern District of Texas jury has slapped Samsung with a $5.9 million verdict, finding it infringed two claims of German intellectual property licensing company Papst’s patent covering data transfers that occur in smartphones and tablets.
DiNovo Price Appears on Behalf of Plaintiffs in German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation11/08/2017
DiNovo Price LLP attorneys Christopher Goodpastor, Nicole Glauser, and Gabriel Gervey appeared on behalf of Lonny Gold and Glen Reder, proposed lead Plaintiffs for a putative class of consumer vehicle purchasers and lessees in In re German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
In re Dental Supplies Antitrust Litigation: Plaintiffs Defeat Henry Schein, Patterson Dental and Benco Motions to Dismiss09/28/2016
In In re Dental Supplies Antitrust Litigation, Putative Class Plaintiff dental practices and dental labs defeated the respective motions to dismiss of defendants Henry Schein, Patterson Dental and Benco.
DiNovo Price Files Dental Supplies Antitrust Class Action01/21/2016
DiNovo Price LLP filed a proposed antitrust class action on behalf of dental practices and laboratories alleging that the three largest U.S. distributors of dental supplies and equipment fixed price margins, pressured manufacturers to boycott competitors, and agreed not to poach each other’s employees.