DiNovo Price LLP | Intellectual Property and Antitrust Litigation Law Firm in Texas | Gregory Donahue | Representative Matters
This links to the home page
Professionals
Gregory  S. Donahue

PRACTICE AREAS

Intellectual Property Litigation
Inter Partes Review

EDUCATION

  • University of Texas School of Law (J.D. 1999)
  • Dartmouth College (A.B. Engineering Sciences 1996)

LICENSES & ADMISSIONS

  • Licensed to practice by State Bar of Texas
  • Licensed to practice at United States Patent and Trademark Office
  • Admitted in Eastern, Western and Southern Districts of Texas
  • Registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Gregory S. Donahue
Partner
CONTACT INFORMATION
Tel: (512) 539-2625
v-card icon V-Card
  • Bandspeed, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., et al. (W.D. Tex.)

    Represented plaintiff hardware company in a patent litigation relating to Bluetooth communications against numerous integrated circuit manufacturers. The matter settled favorably for confidential sums.

  • eWatch, Inc. v. Apple Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex.)

    Represented plaintiff hardware and software company in patent litigation relating to image capture, storage, and transmission against numerous manufacturers of camera phones. The matter settled favorably for confidential sums.

  • Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., K.G. v. Apple, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex., PTAB, Fed. Cir.)

    Represent patent owners in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to high data rate, device-independent information transfer against multiple cell phone manufacturers. Trial court denied motion to transfer venue and appeal court denied mandamus. Navigated the filing of twenty-three (23) IPRs of data transfer technology patents by nine (9) accused infringers, securing non-institution of many petitions and resulting in survival of patentable claims asserted in litigation. Obtained $5.9 million jury verdict against one defendant; other defendants settled favorably.

  • Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. et al. (Fed. Cir. & N.D. Cal.)

    Represented patent owner in enforcement of patents related to digital rights management, resulting in favorable settlements.

  • Inter Partes Review re Camera Phones

    Navigated the filing of twenty (20) IPRs of camera phone technology patents by seven (7) accused infringers and a non-practicing entity, securing non-institution of several petitions and resulting in survival of patentable claims asserted in litigation.

  • Inter Partes Review re Data Transfer Technology

    Navigated the filing of twenty-three (23) IPRs of data transfer technology patents by nine (9) accused infringers, securing non-institution of many petitions and resulting in survival of patentable claims asserted in litigation.

  • Inter Partes Review re Wireless Technology

    Navigated the filing of eleven (11) IPRs of wireless technology patents by three (3) accused infringers, resulting in survival of patentable claims asserted in litigation. No IPR invalidated all of its challenged claims.